翻译硕士英语2017(211)【试题+答案】
2017年山东大学外国语学院211翻译硕士英语考研真题及详解
I. Vocabulary and Grammar (30 points)
Directions: Beneath each sentence there are four words or phrases marked A, B, C and D. Choose the answer that best
completes the sentence. Mark your answers on your ANSWER SHEET.
- Since the island soil has been barren for so many years, the natives must now . much of their food.
A. deliver
B. import
C. produce
D. develop
【答案】B
【解析】句意:由于岛上的土壤已经贫了这么多年,当地居民现在必须进口他们的大部分食物。import进口。
deliver投递。produce生产。develop开发。
- Because Jenkins neither attacks nor defends either management or the striking workers, both sides admire his
journalistic
A. acumen
B. neutrality
C. aptitude
D. flair
【答案】B
【解析】句意:因为詹金斯对管理层和罢工的工人都持既不攻击也不辩护的态度,所以双方都欣赏他的新闻中
立性。neutrality中立。acumen敏锐。aptitude天资。flair才华,天赋。
- Some anthropologists claim that a few apes have been taught a rudimentary sign language, but skeptics argue that the
apes are only their trainers.
A. imitating
B. condoning
C. instructing
D. acknow ledging
【答案】A
【解析】句意:一些人类学家声称,一些猿类已经被传授了一种基本的手语,但怀疑论者认为,猿类只是在模
仿他们的训练者。imitate模仿。condone宽恕。instruct指导。acknowledge承认。
- It is ironic that the. insights of the great thinkers are voiced so often that they have become mere clichés.
A. original
B. banal
C. dubious
D. philosophical
【答案】A
【解析】句意:具有讽刺意味的是,伟大的思想家们的独创见解被表达的太过频繁,以至于这些见解变成了陈
词滥调。original独创的。banal陈腐的。dubious 可疑的。philosophical哲学的;泰然自若的。
- The most frustrating periods of any diet are the inevitable plateaus, when weight loss if not stops.
A. accelerates
B. halts
C. contracts
D. slows
【答案】D
【解析】句意:任何节食中不可避免的会有一段令人沮丧的停滞期,在这个时期内,体重减少就算不是完全停
止,也会减慢。slow变慢。accelerate加快。halt停止。contract收缩。
- Since the author’s unflattering references to her friends were so . _, she was surprised that her allusions were
recognized.
A. laudatory
B. obvious
C. oblique
D. critical
【答案】C
【解析】句意:由于作者对于她朋友的引用非常隐晦,所以她很惊诉她的暗示能被识别出来。oblique隐嗨的。
laudatory称赞的。obvious明显的。critical关键的。
- Mark was intent on maintaining his status as first in his class; because even the smallest mistakes infuriated him, he
reviewed all his papers. before submitting them to his teacher.
A. explicitly
B. perfunctorily
C. honestly
D. assiduously
【答案】D
【解析】句意:马克决心保持他在班上的第一名,因为即使是最小的错误也会激怒他,所以在交给老师之前,
他把所有论文都认真地检查了一遍。assiduously刻苦地;勤勉地。explicitly明确地。perfunctorily敷衍地。honestly
诚实地。
- Since many disadvantaged individuals view their situations as immutable as well as intolerable their attitudes are best
described as -
A. obscure
B. bellicose
C. sanguine
D. resigned
【答案】D
【解析】句意:因为很多处于劣势的人认为他们的处境是不可改变的且不可忍受的,所以,顺从是对他们态度
最好的描述。resigned顺从的。obscure昏暗的。bellicose好战的。sanguine乐观的。
- The subtleties of this novel are evident not so much in the character delineation as they are in its profoundly -
plot structure.
A. eclectic
B. trite
C. aesthetic
D. intricate
【答案】D
【解析】句意:这部小说的微妙之处,与其说体现在人物描写中,不如说是在复杂深刻的情节结构中体现的更
为明显。intricate 复杂的。eclectic 折衷的。trite 陈腐的。aesthetic 审美的。
- The police the witness about the accident.
A. question
B. ask
C. interrogate
D. inquire
【答案】C
【解析】句意:警察盘问这场事故的目击者。这四个动词都有“询问”之意。interrogate意为“盘问,提问题”,
多指为了某种特殊目的,希望把一切搞清楚而进行的有条理的询问,符合题意。question指或为了解情况因感
到可疑,弄清究竟而发问。ask 指对不了解的事情提出问题,常用在口语中。inquire较正式用词,指为得到
真实情况而详细询问或调查了解。
- If it is true that morality cannot exist without religion, then does not the erosion of religion herald the — of
morality?
A. regulation
B. basis
C. belief
D. collapse
【答案】D
【解析】句意:如果没有宗教,道德是不可能存在的,那么宗教的侵蚀是否预示着道德的衰落呢?collapse失
败,衰落。regulation规则。basis 基础。belief 信仰。
- Certain animal behaviors, such as mating rituals, seem to be . , and therefore unaffected by external factors such
as climate changes, food supply, or the presence of other animals of the same species.
A. learned
B. innate
C. intricate
D. specific
【答案】B
【解析】句意:某些动物的行为,例如交配仪式,似乎是天生的,因此不受外部因素影响,如气候变化,食物
供应,或其他动物的存在。innate天生的。learned博学的。intricate复杂的。specific 特殊的。
- Shaken by two decades of virtual anarchy, the majority of people were ready to buy at any price.
A. order
B. emancipation
C. enfranchisement
D. liberty
【答案】A
【解析】句意:在二十年的无政府状态下,大多数人原意不惜付出任何代价来得到秩序。order命令,秩序。
emancipation解放。enfranchisement解放。liberty自由。
- As a person who combines care with , Marisa completed her duties with meticulousness as well as zeal.
A. levity
B. geniality
C. enthusiasm
D. empathy
【答案】C
【解析】句意:作为一个细心热情的人,Marisa认真谨慎并且满怀热情地完成了她的职责。enthusiasm热情。
levity轻率。geniality亲切。empathy同情。
revived and with new meaning.
A. fathomed
B. instilled
C.foreclosed
D. instigated
【答案】B
【解析】句意:她的政治口号实际上是再次使用那些陈词滥调,只是注入了新的含义,她那些精明的竞选管理
人应对这种情况负责。instill逐渐灌输。fathom理解。foreclose阻止。instigate教唆。
- The stoic former general led his civilian life as he had his military life, with simplicity and dignity.
A. benevolent
B. informal
C. austere
D. succinct
【答案】C
【解析】句意:这位坚忍的前将军的平民生活像他的军旅生活一样简朴。austere朴素的,简朴的;严峻的,严
厉的。benevolent与人为善的,慈善的。informal非正式的。succinct简明扼要的。
- Although bound to impose the law, a judge is free to use his discretion to — the anachronistic barbarity of some
criminal penalties.
A. mitigate
B. understand
C. condone
D. provoke
【答案】A
【解析】句意:尽管执行法律,法官可以自由地使用他的自由裁量权来减轻对那些不合时宜的野蛮行为的刑事
处罚。mitigate减轻。understand理解。condone宽恕,赦免。provoke驱使;激怒。
- Henry viewed Melissa as —; she seemed to be against any position regardless of its merits.
A. heretical
B. disobedient
C. contrary
D. inattentive
【答案】C
【解析】句意:亨利将梅利莎视为乖庆的,她似乎对任何立场都反对,无论其是否有可取之处。contrary乖庆
的,好与人作对的。heretical异教的,异端的。disobedient不服从的,违抗的。inattentive疏忽的,漫不经心
的。
- Dr. Schwartz’s lecture on art, while detailed and scholarly, focused exclusively on the premodern; some students may
have appreciated his specialized knowledge, but those with more - _ interests may have been disappointed.
A. medieval
B. comprehensive
C. technical
D. creative
【答案】B
【解析】句意:Schwartz博士关于艺术的讲座,虽然详细且有学术性,但是只专注于前现代;有些学生可能欣
赏他的专业知识,但那些兴趣更加全面的学生可能会失望。comprehensive综合的,全面的。medieval中世纪
的。technical工艺的。creative创造性的。
- Only when one actually vis its the ancient ruins of marvelous bygone civilizations does one truly appreciate the sad
of human greatness.
A. perspicacity
B. magnitude
C. artistry
D. transience
【答案】D
【解析】句意:只有当一个人去参观古老的古文明遗迹时,他才会真正欣赏人类伟大的短暂无常。transience
短暂,无常。perspicacity洞察力。magnitude大小,重要级。artistry艺术性。
II. Reading Comprehension (40 points)
Section 1 Multiple choice (20 points)
Directions: In this section there are two reading passages followed by multiple-choice questions. Read the passages and
then mark your answers on your ANSWER SHEET.
Passage A
These days we hear a lot of nonsense about the ‘great classless society’. The idea that the twentieth century is the
age of the common man has become one of the great cliches of our time, The same old arguments are put forward in
evidence. Here are some of them: monarchy as a system of government has been completely discredited. The monarchies
that survive have been deprived of all political power. Inherited wealth has been savagely reduced by taxation and, in
rule; the great millennium has become a political reality, But has it? Close examination doesn’t bear out the claim.
It is a fallacy to suppose that all men are equal and that society will be leveled out if you provide everybody with
the same educational opportunities. (It is debatable whether you can ever provide everyone with the same educational
opportunities, but that is another question.) The fact is that nature dispenses brains and ability with a total disregard for
spread of education has destroyed the old class system and created a new one. Rewards are based on merit. For
‘aristocracy’ read ‘meritocracy’; in other respects, society remains unaltered: the class system is rigidly maintained.
Genuine ability, animal cunning, skill, the knack of seizing opportunities, all bring material rewards. And what is
the first thing people do when they become rich? They use their wealth to secure the best possible opportunities for their
children, to give them ‘a good start in life’. For all the lip service we pay to the idea of equality, we do not consider this
wrong in the western world. Private schools which offer unfair advantages over state schools are not banned because one
of the principles in a democracy is that people should be free to choose how they will educate their children. In this way,
the new meritocracy can perpetuate itself to a certain extent: an able child from a wealthy home can succeed far more
rapidly than his poorer counterpart. Wealth is also used indiscriminately to further political ends. It would be almost
impossible to become the leader of a democracy without massive financial backing. Money is as powerful a weapon as
ever it was.
In societies wholly dedicated to the principle of social equality, privileged private education is forbidden. But even
here people are rewarded according to their abilities. In fact, so great is the need for skilled workers that the least able
may be neglected. Bright children are carefully and expensively trained to become future rulers. In the end, all political
ideologies boil down to the same thing: class divisions persist whether you are ruled by a feudal king or an educated
peasant.
- What is the main idea of this passage?
A. Equality of opportunity in the twentieth century has not destroyed the class system.
B. Equality means money.
C. There is no such society as classless society.
D. Nature can’t give you a classless society.
- According to the author, the same educational opportunities can’t get rid of inequality because
A. the principle ‘survival of the fittest’ exists
B. nature ignores equality in dispensing brains and ability
C. material rewards are for genuine ability
D. people have the freedom how to educate their children
- Who can obtain more rapid success?
A. Those with wealth.
B. Those with the best brains.
C. Those with the best opportunities.
D. Those who have the ability to catch at opportunities.
- Why does the author say the new meritocracy can perpetuate itself to a certain extent?
A. Money decides everything.
B. Private schools offer advantages over state schools.
C. People are free to choose the way of educating their children.
D. Wealth is used for political ends.
- According to the author, ‘class divisions’ refers to
A. the rich and the poor
B. Different opportunities for people
C. Oppressor and the oppressed
D. Genius and stupidity
【答案与解析】
21.A文章第一段对无阶级社会的论点进行了反驳(Closeexaminationdoesn’tbearouttheclaim),第二段提出教
育的普及摧毁了老的阶级体制,却又创造了新的阶级体制。后面两端集中论述了金钱的作用。因此,文
章的主旨是说二十世纪平等的机遇没有摧毁阶级制度,选A。
- B 文中第二段的第三句提到,“nature dispenses brains and ability with a total disregard for the principle of
equality”,即自然在赋予人智慧和能力时是不平等的。因此,本题选B项。
- A 第三段的倒数第四句提到,an able child from a wealthy home can succeed farmore rapidly than his poorer
counterpart,也就是说富裕家庭的孩子比贫穷的孩子更快获得成功,因此选A项。
- A 第三段的第三句提到, They use their wealth to secure the best possible opportunities for their children, to give
them‘agood start in life’,也就是说,用金钱为孩子不断提供更好的机会,因此金钱的作用十分重要,因
此选A项。
25.A最后一段的最后一句提到,无论你是在封建帝王统治时期,还是在受过教育的农民统治时期,阶级划分
(classdivision)始终存在,这里的classdivision,指的是富人和穷人,因此选A项。
Passage B
The tourist trade is booming. With all this coming and going, you’d expect greater understanding to develop
between the nations of the world. Not a bit of it! Superb systems of communication by air, sea and land make it possible
for us to visit each other’s countries at a moderate cost. What was once the ‘grand tour’, reserved for only the very rich,
is now within everybody’s grasp. The package tour and chartered flights are not to be sneered at. Modern travelers enjoy
a level of comfort which the lords and ladies on grand tours in the old days couldn’t have dreamed of. But what’s the
sense of this mass exchange of populations if the nations of the world remain basically ignorant of each other?
Many tourist organizations are directly responsible for this state of affairs. They deliberately set out to protect their
clients from too much contact with the local population. The modern tourist leads a cosseted, sheltered life. He lives at
international hotels, where he eats his international food and sips his international drink while he gazes at the natives
from a distance. Conducted tours to places of interest are carefully censored. The tourist is allowed to see only what the
organizers want him to see and no more. A strict schedule makes it impossible for the tourist to wander off on his own;
and anyway, language is always a barrier, so he is only too happy to be protected in this way. At its very worst, this leads
to a new and hideous kind of colonization. The summer quarters of the inhabitants of the cite universities: are
eat paella, but fish and chips.
The sad thing about this situation is that it leads to the persistence of national stereotypes. We don’t see the people
of other nations as they really are, but as we have been brought up to believe they are. You can test this for yourself. Take
five nationalities, say, French, German, English, American and Italian. Now in your mind, match them with these five
adjectives: musical, amorous, cold, pedantic, native. Far from providing us with any insight into the national
characteristics of the peoples just mentioned, these adjectives actually act as barriers. So when you set out on your
travels, the only characteristics you notice are those which confirm your preconceptions. You come away with the highly
unoriginal and inaccurate impression that, say, ‘Anglo-Saxons are hypocrites’ of that ‘Latin peoples shout a lot’. You
only have to make a few foreign friends to understand how absurd and harmful national stereotypes are. But how can
you make foreign friends when the tourist trade does its best to prevent you?
Carried to an extreme, stereotypes can be positively dangerous. Wild generalizations stir up racial hatred and blind
us to the basic fact—how trite it sounds!---That all people are human. We are all similar to each other and at the same
time all unique.
- The best title for this passage is
A. tourism contributes nothing to increasing understanding between nations
B. tourism is tiresome
C. conducted tour is dull
D. tourism really does something to one’s country
- What is the author’s attitude toward tourism?
A. Apprehensive.
B. Negative.
C. Critical.
D. Appreciative.
- Which word in the following is the best to summarize Latin people shout a lot?
A. Silent.
B. Noisy.
C. Lively.
D. Active.
- The purpose of the author’s criticism is to point out .
A. conducted tour is disappointing
B. the way of touring should be changed
C. when traveling, you notice characteristics which confirm preconception
D. national stereotypes should be changed
- What is “grand tour” now?
A. Moderate cost.
B. Local sight-seeing is investigated by the tourist organization.
C. People enjoy the first-rate comforts.
D. Everybody can enjoy the grand tour”.
【答案与解析】
26.A第一段的最后一句提到,如果世界上的国家仍然对彼此一无所知,那么这种大规模人口交换的意义是什
么呢?文中第二、三段的内容围绕缺乏对旅行地的了解以及国家之间的刻板印象展开,因此,A项(旅
行不会促进国家间的了解)为正确答案。
- C 由全文可知,作者认为旅行中存在一些问题,例如缺少与当地居民的接触,容易产生对于某个国家和民
族的误解和刻板印象等。总体来说,作者的态度是批评的(critical)。
- B 倒数第二段的倒数第二句提到,你需要交几个外国朋友才会发现国家的刻板印象是多么荒谬和有害(to
understand how absurd and harmful national stereotypes are)。结合题中所说的“shout a lot”可知,答案应
是吵闹的(noisy)。
- B 作者在在第二段开头指出,之所以缺乏对旅行地的了解是因为旅游组织故意避免游客和当地居民接触
(protecttheir clients from toomuchcontactwith the local population.)。由此可推断,作者认为,旅行的方
式应该改变。因此,选B项。
- D 第一段的第五句提到,“What was once the ‘grand tour’, reserved for only the very rich, is now within
everybody’s grasp”,意思是,曾经只有最富有的人专享的“大旅行”现在人人都可获得。因此,选D项。
Section 2Answering questions (20 points)
Directions: Read the following passages and then answer IN COMPLETE SENTENCES the questions which follow each
your ANSWER SHEET.
Questions 1-3
Kidnappings for ransom, drug-smuggling, fake invoicing and extortion are just a few of the ways in which terrorists
raise cash for their nefarious deeds. Some scams take advantage of globalization: American officials found that
Hizbullah, a Lebanese movement, raised funds by exporting used cars from America and selling them in West Africa.
Governments are understandably keen to cut terrorists off from sources of cash, and have been taking drastic steps
to punish banks for involvement in financing dangerous people. In 2012 the American authorities imposed a s$1.9 billion
fine on HSBC, a British bank, for lax controls on money-laundering. Big fines have been meted out to Barclays, ING
and Standard Chartered for money-laundering or sanctions-busting. BNP Paribas of France is said to be facing a fine of
as much as $10 billion in America. Such stiff penalties are popular, and provide great press for ambitious prosecutors.
Cut the flow of money to terrorism, their thinking goes, and it will wither.
Yet there are two problems with this approach. First, the regulations are so demanding and the fines so large that
banks are walking away from countries and businesses where they perceive even the faintest whiff of risk. American
regulators, for instance, require banks to know not only who their customers are, and what they plan to do with their cash,
but also the identities and intentions of their customers’ customers. Correspondent-banking relationships—the arteries of
global finance that allow people and firms to send money from one country to another, even if their own bank does not
have a branch there—are therefore collaps ing. Some of world’s biggest banks privately say they are cutting as many as a
third of these relationships.
This retreat will have little impact on the rich world. Britain’s Lloyds Banking Group, say, will probably always
transact with Wells Fargo in America or ICBC in China. But it could prove devastating to small, poor countries whose
banks lose their big international partners just because the costs of checking up on them outweigh the paltry profits they
generate. Some countries risk being cut off from the financial system altogether: British banks last year threatened to
close the last pipeline for money transfers into Somalia, Others will see the c osts of intermediation rise: bankers talk of a
tenfold increase in fees paid to send money to countries such as Tanzania. Cotton farmers in Mall and small exporters in
assistance in countries such as Syria are struggling to get banks to let them send aid. Making it harder to follow the
money.
Were all of this actually preventing terrorism it might be judged a fair trade-off. Yet-and this is the second problem
with this approach—it seems likely to be ineffective or even counter-productive. Terrorism is not particularly expensive,
and the money needed to finance it can travel by informal routes. In 2012 guards on the border between Nigeria and
Niger arrested a man linked to Boko Haram, a Nigerian terror group, with 35,000 in his underpants: laughable, except
that the group has killed around 1,500 people this year alone. Restrictions on banks will encourage terrorists to avoid the
banking system. That may hinder rather than help the fight against terrorism. A former spy complains that it has become
When the G20 meets later this year it should urge its members to accept the risk that even in well-regulated banking
systems money may find its way to terrorists. Banks should be given clear guidance on necessary safeguards, but not
held responsible for every breach.
-
Why does the American government impose fines on banks? How severe are the fines?
-
What impacts do the fines have on banking?
-
Why do the fines fail to prevent terrorism?
【答案与解析】
- The American government imposes fines on banks for money-laundering or sanctions-busting. In 2012 the American
authorities imposed a 10
billion in America.
(由第二段的第三句可知,美国政府对银行进行罚款是因为银行涉嫌洗钱或违反制裁,对汇丰银行的罚款金额
为19亿美元,对法国巴黎银行的罚款额为100亿美元。)
- The fines are so large that banks are walking away from countries and businesses where they perceive even the faintest
whiff of risk.
(由第三段的第二句可知,罚款对银行的影响是,银行都在远离国家和企业。)
- Restrictions on banks will encourage terrorists to avoid the banking system and that may hinder rather than help the
fight against terrorism.
(由最后一段的第五句可知,罚款无法阻止恐怖主义是因为,对银行的限制将促使恐怖分子不再使用银行系统。)
Questions 4-5
CHINA’S biggest carmaker does not seem to be doing so badly, a first glance at SAIC’s third quarter results on
October 30th would suggest, Net profits rose by nearly 5% compared with a year earlier, to 6.8 billion Yuan ($1.1
billion). But SAIC, like the country’s many other domestic car firms, is not firing on all cylinders and is far from living
up to the hopes the government has invested in the state giant.
SAIC makes a quarter of the vehicles that crawl along the country’s congested roads, In the third quarter it sold
1.3m cars, 9% more than a year earlier. Overall Chinese demand, tempered by a cooling economy, grew by just 4%. But
SAIC’s success was mostly due not to cars bearing its own badges, but Volkswagen and General Motors models, made in
factories jointly operated with these two Western giants.
Foreign carmakers were forced to collaborate with Chinese ones as the price for entering what is now the world’s
largest automotive market. SAIC’s partnerships with VW and GM are flourishing, as are the other Chinese foreign joint
ventures. The government had hoped that, by now, domestic firms would have absorbed all they needed to know from
the foreigners about making and selling world-class cars, and be ready to get by without them.
But the success of the joint ventures has made the Chinese firms complacent. They have failed to develop their own
technology, styling or marketing capability, SAIC has long been losing money on its own-brand cars, which sell under
badges such as Roewe and MG (the latter a faded British brand it bought along with other parts of the collapsed Rover
Group). In the latest quarter the losses rose sharply, to around 2 billion Yuan. A vicious circle has set in: the poor
financial performance of Chinese firms’ own brands has sapped their will to invest in research and development to
improve their performance on the road and in the showrooms. Little wonder, then, that Chinese motorists spurn pleas for
patriotism and covet foreign-badged motors.
The government has tried to fix the problem by pressing the foreign carmakers to work with the locals to create new
brands combining international flair with Chinese characteristics. So far this has made little difference: Chinese brands
account for only about one-third of domestic sales, and their share continues to dwindle.
Chinese vehic les have not travelled well. Exports, mostly to poor countries where drivers care about price more
than image, were fewer than 600,000 in 2013, 10% lower than the year before. SAIC’s hopes that Rover Group’s brands
and technology would help it do better in rich countries have yet to be met. Three years after it relaunched the MG brand
in Britain, it is selling just a few hundred cars a month there. Likewise Geely, a smaller Chinese maker, has yet to see
much benefit from buying Volvo of Sweden.
China’s carmakers are still trying to improve. A recent survey from JD Power, a market-research firm, shows that
the quality gap with foreign rivals is closing. The Chinese firms are busy hiring Western designers to make their models
more distinguished. But like many of its peers, SAIC lacks foreign managers who have the skills to market cars abroad
and set up the service networks that buyers expect. No wonder the government’s ambition for China to boast two or three
world-class car firms, with badges as recognizable as Toyotas or Fords, remains a distant dream.
-
Please introduce SAIC briefly in your own words.
-
What are the problems China’s carmakers face?
【答案与解析】
- SAIC is the biggest carmaker of China.
(由第一段的第一句可知,上汽集团是中国最大的汽车制造商。)
- The Chinese carmakers are not able to develop their own technology, styling or marketing capability.
(由第四段的第二句可知,中国的汽车制造商面临的问题是不能发展自已的技术、款式和营销能力。)
III. Writing (30 points)
According to a recent survey of Chinese women, a majority of mothers born after 1990 want to be stay-at-home
moms. Many women are aware of the challenges of motherhood, especially when they have to juggle a full-time job
outside the home. Which is worthwhile, being a full time working or a stay at home mom?
What is your opinion about this?
Write an essay of about 4o0 words to express your views on the topic.
【参考范文】
To Be a Housewife or a Career Woman?
There is a long-running debate as to whether women should be stay-at-home moms or full time working moms.
Some argue that women should take more responsibilities for the family and they are supposed to stay at home to take
care of their husbands and children. Others believe that women should choose to be career women to realize their social
values. As far as I am concerned, either being a full time working or a stay-at-home mom is worthwhile, but it is better
for individual development of women to have a job.
housework for the family. Sometimes, women choose to be stay-at home moms just because the old and the biased idea
force them to do so. All men should share the housework with their wives and it will become less difficult for women to
balance their job and responsibilities for family.
job, women do not have any income and they must rely on their husbands, which may enable these women to be
dependent and unconfident. Because they are busy with the housework, they do not have much time in learning and
communication, and they may be detached from the society.
Thirdly, being career women or full time working moms will bring many benefits. The most direct benefit is the
increase of the family income and it will provide a better material condition for children. For women, the income means
their economic independence and they may become more confident. The second benefit is that people always realize
which makes life more meaningful. The third benefit can be shown that work can create challenges and opportunities. On
the one hand, different tasks require women to learn and to update their knowledge, and therefore, the work may enhance
their abilities and enable them to make progress; on the other hand, compared with staying at home, having a job means
having more opportunities to meet and to communicate with others like colleagues and clients which may become
friends.
In conclusion, women can choose to be stay-at-home moms or full time working moms, but being career women
will benefit themselves and their family better.
【解析】
题目要求以“做全职妈妈还是职业女性”为主题,写一篇不少于400字的作文。
范文中,第一段阐明观点,做职业女性更有利于女性的个人及其家庭的发展。第二、三、四段分别对该论点
进行具体的论证。第二段提出,男女平等,女性不应该因为社会上存在的一些偏见而放弃自已的工作。第三段论
证,做全职妈妈存在一系列弊端,包括女性在经济上失去独立性,缺乏学习和外界沟通的机会,可能会与社会脱
节。第四段论证,工作会促进女性个人及其家庭发展,包括有利于女性经济独立,实现自身价值,结交朋友,提
高家庭收入等。最后一段进行总结,再次阐明观点,即做职业女性更有利于女性的个人及其家庭发展。